{p.171}
CHAPTER V
RITES AND CEREMONIES
SECTION I—IDOL PROCESSIONS
THOSE who have read the account of the last idol procession
in the capital of Scotland, in John Knox's History of the Reformation,
cannot easily have forgot the tragi-comedy with which it ended. The light of the
Gospel had widely spread, the Popish idols had lost their fascination, and
popular antipathy was everywhere rising against them. "The images," says the
historian, "were stolen away in all parts of the country; and in Edinburgh was
that great idol called Sanct Geyle [the patron saint of the capital], first
drowned in the North Loch, after burnt, which raised no small trouble in the
town."1
The bishops demanded of the Town Council either "to get them again the old Sanct
Geyle, or else, upon their (own) expenses, to make a new image."2
The Town Council could not do the one, and the other they absolutely refused to
do; for they were now convinced of the sin of idolatry. The bishops and priests,
however, were still mad upon their idols; and, as the anniversary of the feast
of St. Giles was approaching, when the saint used to be carried in procession
through the town, they determined to do their best, that the accustomed
procession should take place with as much pomp as possible. For this purpose, "a
marmouset idole" was borrowed from the Grey friars, which the people, in
derision, called "Young Sanct Geyle," and which was made to do service instead
of the old one. On the appointed day, says Knox, "there assembled priests,
friars, canons .... with taborns and trumpets, banners, and bagpipes; and who
was there to lead the ring but the Queen Regent herself, with all her shavelings,
for honour of that feast. West about goes it, and comes down the High Street,
and down to the Canno Cross."3
As long as the Queen was present, all went to the heart's content of the priests
and their partisans. But no sooner had majesty retired to dine, than some in the
crowd, who had viewed the whole concern with an evil eye, "drew nigh to the
idol, as willing to help to bear him, and getting the fertour (or barrow) on
their shoulders, began to shudder, thinking that thereby the idol should have
fallen. But that was provided and prevented by the iron nails [with which it was
fastened to the fertour]; and so began one to cry, Down with the idol, down with
it; and so without {p.172} delay it was pulled
down. Some brag made the priests patrons at the first; but when they saw the
feebleness of their god, for one took him by the heels, and dadding4
his head to the calsay,5
left Dagon without head or hands, and said, Fye upon thee, thou young Sanct
Geyle, thy father would have tarried6
four such [blows]; this considered, we say, the priests and friars fled faster
than they did at Pinkey Cleuch. There might have been seen so sudden a fray as
seldom has been seen amongst that sort of men within this realm; for down goes
the crosses, off goes the surplice, round caps corner with the crowns. The Grey
friars gaped, the Black friars blew, the priests panted and fled, and happy was
he that first gat the house; for such are sudden fray came never amongst the
generation of Antichrist within this realm before."7
Such an idol procession among a people who had begun to study and relish the
Word of God, elicited nothing but indignation and scorn. But in Popish lands,
among a people studiously kept in the dark, such processions are among the
favourite means which the Romish Church employs to bind its votaries to itself.
The long processions with images borne on men's shoulders, with the gorgeous
dresses of the priests, and the various habits of different orders of monks and
nuns, with the aids of flying banners and the thrilling strains of instrumental
music, if not too closely scanned, are well fitted "plausibly to amuse" the
worldly mind, to gratify the love for the picturesque, and when the emotions
thereby called forth are dignified with the names of piety and religion, to
minister to the purposes of spiritual despotism. Accordingly, Popery has ever
largely availed itself of such pageants. On joyous occasions, it has sought to
consecrate the hilarity and excitement created by such processions to the
service of its idols; and in seasons of sorrow, it has made use of the same
means to draw forth the deeper wail of distress from the multitudes that throng
the procession, as if the mere loudness of the cry would avert the displeasure
of a justly offended God. Gregory, commonly called the Great, seems to have been
the first who, on a large scale, introduced those religious processions into the
Roman Church. In 590, when Rome was suffering under the heavy hand of God from
the pestilence, he exhorted the people to unite publicly in supplication to God,
appointing that they should meet at daybreak in SEVEN DIFFERENT COMPANIES,
according to their respective ages, SEXES, and stations, and walk in seven
different processions, reciting litanies or supplications, till they all met at
one place.8
They did so, and proceeded singing and uttering the words, "Lord, have mercy
upon us," carrying along with them, as Baronius relates, by Gregory s express
command, an image of the Virgin.9
The very idea of such processions was an affront to the majesty of heaven; it
implied that {p.173} God who is a Spirit "saw with
eyes of flesh," and might be moved by the imposing picturesqueness of such a
spectacle, just as sensuous mortals might. As an experiment it had but slender
success. In the space of one hour, while thus engaged, eighty persons fell to
the ground, and breathed their last.10
Yet this is now held up to Britons as "the more excellent way" for deprecating
the wrath of God in a season of national distress. "Had this calamity," says Dr.
Wiseman, referring to the Indian disasters, "had this calamity fallen upon our
forefathers in Catholic days, one would have seen the streets of this city
[London] trodden in every direction by penitential processions, crying out, like
David, when pestilence had struck the people." If this allusion to David has any
pertinence or meaning, it must imply that David, in the time of pestilence,
headed some such "penitential procession." But Dr. Wiseman knows, or ought to
know, that David did nothing of the sort, that his penitence was expressed in no
such way as by processions, and far less by idol processions, as "in the
Catholic days of our forefathers," to which we are invited to turn back. This
reference to David, then, is a mere blind, intended to mislead those who are not
given to Bible reading, as if such "penitential processions" had something of
Scripture warrant to rest upon. The Times, commenting on this recommendation of
the Papal dignitary, has hit the nail on the head. "The historic idea," says
that journal, "is simple enough, and as old as old can be. We have it in Homer
the procession of Hecuba and the ladies of Troy to the shrine of Minerva, in the
Acropolis of that city." It was a time of terror and dismay in Troy, when
Diomede, with resistless might, was driving everything before him, and the
overthrow of the proud city seemed at hand. To avert the apparently inevitable
doom, the Trojan Queen was divinely directed
"To lead the assembled train
Of Troy s chief matrons to Minerva's fane."
And she did so:
"Herself .... the long procession leads;
The train majestically slow proceeds.
Soon as to Ilion s topmost tower they come,
And awful reach the high Palladian dome,
Antenor's consort, fair Theano, waits
As Pallas priestess, and unbars the gates.
With hands uplifted and imploring eyes,
They fill the dome with supplicating cries."11
Here is a precedent for "penitential processions" in connection with idolatry entirely to the point, such as will be sought for in vain in the history of David, or any of the Old Testament saints. Religious processions, and especially processions with images, whether of a jubilant or sorrowful description, are purely Pagan. In the {p.174} Word of God we find two instances in which there were processions practised with Divine sanction; but when the object of these processions is compared with the avowed object and character of Romish processions, it will be seen that there is no analogy between them and the processions of Rome. The two cases to which I refer are the seven days encompassing of Jericho, and the procession at the bringing up of the ark of God from Kirjath-jearim to the city of David. The processions, in the first case, though attended with the symbols of Divine worship, were not intended as acts of religious worship, but were a miraculous mode of conducting war, when a signal interposition of Divine power was to be vouchsafed. In the other, there was simply the removing of the ark, the symbol of Jehovah's presence, from the place where, for a long period, it had been allowed to lie in obscurity, to the place which the Lord Himself had chosen for its abode; and on such an occasion it was entirely fitting and proper that the transference should be made with all religious solemnity. But these were simply occasional things, and have nothing at all in common with Romish processions, which form a regular part of the Papal ceremonial. But, though Scripture speaks nothing of religious processions in the approved worship of God, it refers once and again to Pagan processions, and these, too, accompanied with images; and it vividly exposes the folly of those who can expect any good from gods that cannot move from one place to another, unless they are carried. Speaking of the gods of Babylon, thus saith the prophet Isaiah (chap. xlvi. 6), "They lavish gold out of the bag, and weigh silver in the balance, and hire a goldsmith; and he maketh it a god: they fall down, yea, they worship. They bear him upon the shoulder, they carry him, and set him in his place, and he standeth; from his place he shall not remove." In the sculptures of Nineveh these processions of idols, borne on men's shoulders, are forcibly represented,12 and form at once a striking illustration of the prophetic language, and of the real origin of the Popish processions. In Egypt, the same practice was observed. In "the procession of shrines," says Wilkinson, "it was usual to carry the statue of the principal deity, in whose honour the procession took place, together with that of the king, and the figures of his ancestors, borne in the same manner, on men's shoulders."13 But not only are the processions in general identified with the Babylonian system. We have evidence that these processions trace their origin to that very disastrous event in the history of Nimrod, which has already occupied so much of our attention. Wilkinson says "that Diodorus speaks of an Ethiopian festival of Jupiter, when his statue was carried in procession, probably to commemorate the supposed refuge of the gods in that country, which," says he, "may have been a memorial of the flight of the Egyptians with their gods."14 The passage of Diodorus, to which {p.175} Wilkinson refers, is not very decisive as to the object for which the statues of Jupiter and Juno (for Diodorus mentions the shrine of Juno as well as of Jupiter) were annually carried into the land of Ethiopia, and then, after a certain period of sojourn there, were "brought back to Egypt again.15 But, on comparing it with other passages of antiquity, its object very clearly appears. Eustathius says, that at the festival in question, "according to some, the Ethiopians used to fetch the images of Zeus, and other gods from the great temple of Zeus at Thebes. With these images they went about at a certain period in Libya, and celebrated a splendid festival for twelve gods."16 As the festival was called an Ethiopian festival; and as it was Ethiopians that both carried away the idols and brought them back again, this indicates that the idols must have been Ethiopian idols; and as we have seen that Egypt was under the power of Nimrod, and consequently of the Cushites or Ethiopians, when idolatry was for a time put down in Egypt,17 what would this carrying of the idols into Ethiopia, the land of the Cushites, that was solemnly commemorated every year, be, but just the natural result of the temporary suppression of the idol-worship inaugurated by Nimrod. In Mexico, we have an account of an exact counter part of this Ethiopian festival. There, at a certain period, the images of the gods were carried out of the country in a mourning-procession, as if taking their leave of it, and then, after a time, they were brought back to it again with every demonstration of joy.18 In Greece, we find a festival of an entirely similar kind, which, while it connects itself with the Ethiopian festival of Egypt on the one hand, brings that festival, on the other, into the closest relation to the penitential procession of Pope Gregory. Thus we find Potter referring first to a "Delphian festival in memory of a JOURNEY of Apollo;"19 and then under the head of the festival called Apollonia, we thus read: "To Apollo, at Ægialea on this account: Apollo having obtained a victory over Python, went to Ægialea, accompanied with his sister Diana; but, being frightened from thence, fled into Crete. After this, the Ægialeans were infected with an epidemical distemper; and, being advised by the prophets to appease the two offended deities, sent SEVEN boys and as many virgins to entreat them to return. [Here is the typical germ of The Sevenfold Litany of Pope Gregory.] Apollo and Diana accepted their piety, .... and it became a custom to appoint chosen boys and virgins, to make a solemn procession, in show, as if they designed to bring back Apollo and Diana, which continued till Pausanias's time."20 The contest between Python and Apollo, in Greece, is just the counterpart of that between Typho and Osiris {p.176} in Egypt; in other words, between Shein and Nimrod. Thus we see the real meaning and origin of the Ethiopian festival, when the Ethiopians carried away the gods from the Egyptian temples. That festival evidently goes back to the time when Nimrod being cut off, idolatry durst not show itself except among the devoted adherents of the "Mighty hunter" (who were found in his own family the family of Cush), when, with great weepings and lamentations, the idolaters fled with their gods on their shoulders, to hide them selves where they might.21 In commemoration of the suppression of idolatry, and the unhappy consequences that were supposed to flow from that suppression, the first part of the festival, as we get light upon it both from Mexico and Greece, had consisted of a procession of mourners; and then the mourning was turned into joy, in memory of the happy return of these banished gods to their former exaltation. Truly a worthy origin for Pope Gregory's "Sevenfold Litany" and the Popish processions.
___________
SECTION II—RELIC WORSHIP
Nothing is more characteristic of Rome than the worship of
relics. Wherever a chapel is opened, or a temple consecrated, it cannot be
thoroughly complete without some relic or other of he-saint or she-saint to give
sanctity to it. The relics of the saints and rotten bones of the martyrs form a
great part of the wealth of the Church. The grossest impostures have been
practised in regard to such relics; and the most drivelling tales have been told
of their wonder-working powers, and that too by Fathers of high name in the
records of Christendom. Even Augustine, with all his philosophical acuteness and
zeal against some forms of false doctrine, was deeply infected with the
grovelling spirit that led to relic worship. Let any one read the stuff with
which he concludes his famous "City of God," and he will in no wise wonder that
Rome has made a saint of him, and set him up for the worship of her devotees.
Take only a specimen or two of the stories with which he bolsters up the
prevalent delusions of his day: "When the Bishop Projectius brought the relics
of St. Stephen to the town called Aquae Tibiltinae, the people came in great
crowds to honour them. Amongst these was a blind woman, who entreated the people
to lead her to the bishop who had the HOLY RELICS. They did so, and the bishop
gave her some flowers which he had in his hand. She took them, and put them to
her eyes, and immediately her sight was restored, so that she passed speedily on
before all the others, no longer requiring to be guided."22
In Augustine's day, the formal "worship" of the relics was not yet established;
but the martyrs to whom they were supposed to have belonged were already invoked
with prayers and supplications, and that with the high approval of the Bishop of
Hippo, as the following story will abundantly show: Here, in Hippo, says he,
there was a {p.177} poor and holy old man, by name
Florentius, who obtained a living by tailoring. This man once lost his coat, and
not being able to purchase another to replace it, he came to the shrine of the
Twenty Martyrs, in this city, and prayed aloud to them, beseeching that they
would enable him to get another garment. A crowd of silly boys who overheard
him, followed him at his departure, scoffing at him, and asking him whether he
had begged fifty pence from the martyrs to buy a coat. The poor man went
silently on towards home, and as he passed near the sea, he saw a large fish
which had been cast up on the sand, and was still panting. The other persons who
were present allowed him to take up this fish, which he brought to one Catosus,
a cook, and a good Christian, who bought it from him for three hundred pence.
With this he meant to purchase wool, which his wife might spin, and make into a
garment for him. When the cook cut up the fish, he found within its belly a ring
of gold, which his conscience persuaded him to give to the poor man from whom he
bought the fish. He did so, saying, at the same time, "Behold how the Twenty
Martyrs have clothed you!"23
Thus did the great Augustine inculcate the worship of dead men, and the
honouring of their wonder-working relics. The "silly children" who "scoffed" at
the tailor's prayer seem to have had more sense than either the "holy old tailor
" or the bishop. Now, if men professing Christianity were thus, in the fifth
century, paving the way for the worship of all manner of rags and rotten bones;
in the realms of Heathendom the same worship had flourished for ages before
Christian saints or martyrs had appeared in the world. In Greece, the
superstitious regard to relics, and especially to the bones of the deified
heroes, was a conspicuous part of the popular idolatry. The work of Pausanias,
the learned Grecian antiquary, is full of reference to this superstition. Thus,
of the shoulder-blade of Pelops, we read that, after passing through divers
adventures, being appointed by the oracle of Delphi, as a divine means of
delivering the Eleans from a pestilence under which they suffered, it "was
committed," as a sacred relic, "to the custody" of the man who had fished it out
of the sea, and of his posterity after him.24
The bones of the Trojan Hector were preserved as a precious deposit at Thebes.
"They" [the Thebans], says Pausanias, "say that his [Hector's] bones were
brought hither from Troy, in consequence of the following oracle: 'Thebans, who
inhabit the city of Cadmus, if you wish to reside in your country, blest with
the possession of blameless wealth, bring the bones of Hector, the son of Priam,
into your dominions from Asia, and reverence the hero agreeably to the mandate
of Jupiter.'"25
{p.178} Many other similar instances from the same
author might be adduced. The bones thus carefully kept and reverenced were all
believed to be miracle-working bones. From the earliest periods, the system of
Buddhism has been propped up by relics, that have wrought miracles at least as
well vouched as those wrought by the relics of St. Stephen, or by the "Twenty
Martyrs." In the "Mahawanso," one of the great standards of the Buddhist faith,
reference is thus made to the enshrining of the relics of Buddha: "The
vanquisher of foes having perfected the works to be executed within the relic
receptacle, convening an assembly of the priesthood, thus addressed them: The
works that were to be executed by me, in the relic receptacle, are completed.
To-morrow, I shall enshrine the relics. Lords, bear in mind the relics."26
Who has not heard of the Holy Coat of Treves, and its exhibition to the people?
From the following, the reader will see that there was an exactly similar
exhibition of the Holy Coat of Buddha: "Thereupon (the nephew of the Naga Rajah)
by his supernatural gift, springing up into the air to the height of seven
palmyra trees, and stretching out his arm brought to the spot where he was
poised, the Dupathupo (or shrine) in which the DRESS laid aside by Buddho, as
Prince Siddhatto, on his entering the priesthood, was enshrined .... and
EXHIBITED IT TO THE PEOPLE."27
This "Holy Coat" of Buddha was no doubt as genuine, and as well entitled to
worship, as the "Holy Coat" of Treves. The resemblance does not stop here. It is
only a year or two ago since the Pope presented to his beloved son, Francis
Joseph of Austria, a "TOOTH" of "St. Peter," as a mark of his special favour and
regard.28
The teeth of Buddha are in equal request among his worshippers. "King of Devas,"
said a Buddhist missionary, who was sent to one of the principal courts of
Ceylon to demand a relic or two from the Rajah, "King of Devas, thou possessest
the right canine tooth relic (of Buddha), as well as the right collar bone of
the divine teacher. Lord of Devas, demur not
in matters involving the salvation of the land of Lanka."29
Then the miraculous efficacy of these relics is shown in the following: "The
Saviour of the world (Buddha) even after he had attained to Parinibanan or final
emancipation (i.e., after his death), by means of a corporeal relic, performed
infinite acts to the utmost perfection, for the spiritual comfort and mundane
prosperity of mankind. While the Vanquisher (Jeyus) yet lived, what must he not
have done?"30
Now, in the Asiatic Researches, a statement is made in regard to these relics of
Buddha, which marvellously reveals to us the real origin of this Buddhist relic
worship. The statement is this: "The bones or limbs of Buddha were scattered all
over the world, like those of Osiris and Jupiter Zagreus. To collect them was
the first {p.179} duty of his descendants and
followers, and then to entomb them. Out of filial piety, the remembrance of this
mournful search was yearly kept up by a fictitious one, with all possible marks
of grief and sorrow till a priest announced that the sacred relics were at last
found. This is practised to this day by several Tartarian tribes of the religion
of Buddha; and the expression of the bones of the Son of the Spirit of heaven is
peculiar to the Chinese and some tribes in Tartary."31
Here, then, it is evident that the worship of relics is just a part of those
ceremonies instituted to commemorate the tragic death of Osiris or Nimrod, who,
as the reader may remember, was divided into fourteen pieces, which were sent
into so many different regions infected by his apostasy and false worship, to
operate in terrorem upon all who might seek to follow his example. When
the apostates regained their power, the very first thing they did was to seek
for these dismembered relics of the great ringleader in idolatry, and to entomb
them with every mark of devotion. Thus does Plutarch describe the search: "Being
acquainted with this event [viz., the dismemberment of Osiris], Isis set out
once more in search of the scattered members of her husband's body, using a boat
made of the papyrus rush in order more easily to pass through the lower and
fenny parts of the country. .... And one reason assigned for the different
sepulchres of Osiris shown in Egypt is, that wherever any one of his scattered
limbs was discovered she buried it on the spot; though others suppose that it
was owing to an artifice of the queen, who presented each of those cities with
an image of her husband, in order that, if Typho should overcome Horus in the
approaching contest, he might be unable to find the real sepulchre. Isis
succeeded in recovering all the different members, with the exception of one,
which had been devoured by the Lepidotus, the Phagrus, and the Oxyrynchus, for
which reason these fish are held in abhorrence by the Egyptians. To make amends,
she consecrated the Phallus, and instituted a solemn festival to its memory."32
Not only does this show the real origin of relic worship; it shows also that the
multiplication of relics can pretend to the most venerable antiquity. If,
therefore, Rome can boast that she has sixteen or twenty holy coats, seven or
eight arms of St. Matthew, two or three heads of St. Peter, this is nothing more
than Egypt could do in regard to the relics of Osiris. Egypt was covered with
sepulchres of its martyred god; and many a leg and arm and skull, all vouched to
be genuine, were exhibited in the rival burying-places for the adoration of the
Egyptian faithful. Nay, not only were these Egyptian relics sacred themselves,
they CONSECRATED THE VERY GROUND in which they were entombed. This fact is
brought out by Wilkinson, from a statement of Plutarch:33
"The Temple of this deity at Abydos," says he, "was also particularly honoured,
and so holy was the place considered by the Egyptians, that persons living
{p.180} at some distance from it sought, and
perhaps with difficulty obtained, permission to possess a sepulchre within its
Necropolis, in order that, after death, they might repose in GROUND HALLOWED BY
THE TOMB of this great and mysterious deity."34
If the places where the relics of Osiris were buried were accounted peculiarly
holy, it is easy to see how naturally this would give rise to the pilgrimages so
frequent among the heathen. The reader does not need to be told what merit Rome
attaches to such pilgrimages to the tombs of saints, and how, in the Middle
Ages, one of the most favourite ways of washing away sin was to undertake a
pilgrimage to the shrine of St. Jago di Compostella in Spain, or to the Holy
Sepulchre in Jerusalem.35
Now, in the Scripture there is not the slightest trace of any such thing as a
pilgrimage to the tomb of saint, martyr, prophet, or apostle. The very way in
which the Lord saw fit to dispose of the body of Moses in burying it Himself in
the plains of Moab, so that no man should ever know where his sepulchre was, was
evidently designed to rebuke every such feeling as that from which such
pilgrimages arise. And considering whence Israel had come, the Egyptian ideas
with which they were infected, as shown in the matter of the golden calf, and
the high reverence they must have entertained for Moses, the wisdom of God in so
disposing of his body must be apparent. In the land where Israel had so long
sojourned, there were great and pompous pilgrimages at certain seasons of the
year, and these often attended with gross excesses. Herodotus tells us, that in
his time the multitude who went annually on pilgrimage to Bubastis amounted to
700,000 individuals, and that then more wine was drunk than at any other time in
the year.36
Wilkinson thus refers to a similar pilgrimage to Philae: "Besides the
celebration of the great mysteries which took place at Philae, a grand ceremony
was performed at a particular time, when the priests, in solemn procession,
visited his tomb, and crowned it with flowers.37
Plutarch even pretends that all access to the island was forbidden at every
other period, and that no bird would fly over it, or fish swim near this
CONSECRATED GROUND."38
This seems not to have been a procession merely of the priests in the immediate
neighbourhood of the tomb, but a truly national pilgrimage; for, says Diodorus,
"the sepulchre of Osiris at Philae is revered by all the priests throughout
Egypt."39
We have not the same minute information about the relic worship in Assyria or
Babylon; but we have enough to show that, as it was the Babylonian god that was
worshipped in Egypt under the name of Osiris, so in his own country there was
the same superstitious reverence paid to his relics. We have seen already, that
when the Babylonian Zoroaster died, he was said voluntarily to have given his
life as a sacrifice, and to have "charged his countrymen to preserve his
remains" assuring them {p.181} that on the
observance or neglect of this dying command, the fate of their empire would
hinge.40
And, accordingly, we learn from Ovid, that the "Busta Nini," or "Tomb of Ninus,"
long ages thereafter, was one of the monuments of Babylon.41
Now, in comparing the death and fabled resurrection of the false Messiah with
the death and resurrection of the true, when he actually appeared, it will be
found that there is a very remarkable contrast. When the false Messiah died,
limb was severed from limb, and his bones were scattered over the country. When
the death of the true Messiah took place, Providence so arranged it that the
body should be kept entire, and that the prophetic word should be exactly
fulfilled "a bone of Him shall not be broken." When, again, the false Messiah
was pretended to have had a resurrection, that resurrection was in a new body,
while the old body, with all its members, was left behind, thereby showing that
the resurrection was nothing but a pretence and a sham. When, however, the true
Messiah was "declared to be the Son of God with power, by the resurrection from
the dead," the tomb, though jealously watched by the armed unbelieving soldiery
of Rome, was found to be absolutely empty, and no dead body of the Lord was ever
afterwards found, or even pretended to have been found. The resurrection of
Christ, therefore, stands on a very different footing from the resurrection of
Osiris. Of the body of Christ, of course, in the nature of the case, there could
be no relics. Rome, however, to carry out the Babylonian system, has supplied
the deficiency by means of the relics of the saints; and now the relics of St.
Peter and St. Paul, of St. Thomas A Beckett and St. Lawrence O'Toole, occupy the
very same place in the worship of the Papacy as the relics of Osiris in Egypt,
or of Zoroaster in Babylon.
______________
SECTION III—THE CLOTHING AND CROWNING OF IMAGES
In the Church of Rome, the clothing and crowning of images form no insignificant part of the ceremonial. The sacred images are not represented, like ordinary statues, with the garments formed of the same material as themselves, but they have garments put on them from time to time, like ordinary mortals of living flesh and blood. Great expense is often lavished on their drapery; and those who present to them splendid robes are believed thereby to gain their signal favour, and to lay up a large stock of merit for themselves. Thus, in September, 1852, we find the Duke and Duchess of Mont-pensier celebrated in the Tablet, not only for their charity in "giving 3000 reals in alms to the poor," but especially, and above all, for their piety in "presenting the Virgin with a magnificent dress of tissue of gold, with white lace and a silver crown." Somewhat about {p.182} the same time the piety of the dissolute Queen of Spain was testified by a similar benefaction, when she deposited at the feet of the Queen of Heaven the homage of the dress and jewels she wore on a previous occasion of solemn thanksgiving, as well as the dress in which she was attired when she was stabbed by the assassin Merino. "The mantle," says the Spanish journal España, "exhibited the marks of the wound, and its ermine lining was stained with the precious blood of Her Majesty. In the basket (that bore the dresses) were likewise the jewels which adorned Her Majesty's head and breast. Among them was a diamond stomacher, so exquisitely wrought, and so dazzling, that it appeared to be wrought of a single stone."42 This is all sufficiently childish, and presents human nature in a most humiliating aspect; but it is just copied from the old Pagan worship. The same clothing and adorning of the gods went on in Egypt, and there were sacred persons who alone could be permitted to interfere with so high a function. Thus, in the Rosetta Stone we find these sacred functionaries distinctly referred to: "The chief priests and prophets, and those who have access to the adytum to clothe the gods, .... assembled in the temple at Memphis, established the following decree."43 The "clothing of the gods" occupied an equally important place in the sacred ceremonial of ancient Greece. Thus, we find Pausanias referring to a present made to Minerva: "In after times, Laodice, the daughter of Agapenor, sent a veil to Tegea, to Minerva Alea." The epigram [inscription] on this offering indicates, at the same time, the origin of Laodice:—
"Laodice, from Cyprus, the divine,
To her paternal wide-extended land,
This veil an offering to Minerva sent."44
Thus, also, when Hecuba, the Trojan queen, in the instance already referred to, was directed to lead the penitential procession through the streets of Troy to Minerva's temple, she was commanded not to go empty-handed, but to carry along with her, as her most acceptable offering—
"The largest mantle your full wardrobes hold,
Most prized for art, and laboured o'er with gold."
The royal lady punctually obeyed:—
"The Phrygian queen to her rich wardrobe went,
Where treasured odours breathed a costly scent;
There lay the vestures of no vulgar art;
Sidonian maids embroidered every part,
Whom from soft Sydon youthful Paris bore,
With Helen touching on the Tyrian shore.
Here, as the Queen revolved with careful eyes
The various textures and the various dyes,
She chose a veil that shone superior far,
And glowed refulgent as the morning star."45
{p.183}
There is surely a wonderful resemblance here between the piety of the Queen of
Troy and that of the Queen of Spain. Now, in ancient Paganism there was a
mystery couched under the clothing of the gods. If gods and goddesses were so
much pleased by being clothed, it was because there had once been a time in
their history when they stood greatly in need of clothing. Yes, it can be
distinctly established, as has been already hinted, that ultimately the great
god and great goddess of Heathenism, while the facts of their own history were
interwoven with their idolatrous system, were worshipped also as incarnations of
our great progenitors, whose disastrous fall stripped them of their primeval
glory, and made it needful that the hand Divine should cover their nakedness
with clothing specially prepared for them. I cannot enter here into an elaborate
proof of this point; but let the statement of Herodotus be pondered in regard to
the annual ceremony, observed in Egypt, of slaying a ram, and clothing the
FATHER OF THE GODS with its skin.46
Compare this statement with the Divine record in Genesis about the clothing of
the "Father of Mankind" in a coat of sheepskin; and after all that
we have seen of the deification of dead men, can there be a doubt what it was
that was thus annually commemorated? Nimrod him self, when he was cut in pieces,
was necessarily stripped. That exposure was identified with the nakedness of
Noah, and ultimately with that of Adam. His sufferings were represented as
voluntarily undergone for the good of mankind. His nakedness, therefore, and the
nakedness of the "Father of the gods," of whom he was an incarnation, was held
to be a voluntary humiliation too. When, therefore, his suffering was over, and
his humiliation past, the clothing in which he was invested was regarded as a
meritorious clothing, available not only for himself, but for all who were
initiated in his mysteries. In the sacred rites of the Babylonian god, both the
exposure and the clothing that were represented as having taken place, in his
own history, were repeated on all his worshippers, in accordance with the
statement of Firmicus, that the initiated under went what their god had
undergone.47
First, after being duly prepared by magic rites and ceremonies, they were
ushered, in a state of absolute nudity, into the innermost recesses of the
temple. This appears from the following statement of Proclus: "In the most holy
of the mysteries, they say that the mystics at first meet with the many-shaped
genera [i.e., with evil demons], which are hurled forth before the gods: but on
entering the interior parts of the temple, unmoved and guarded by the mystic
rites, they genuinely receive in their bosom divine illumination, and, DIVESTED
OF THEIR GARMENTS, participate, as they would say, of a divine nature."48
When the initiated, thus "illuminated" and made partakers of a "divine nature,"
after being "divested of their garments," were clothed anew, the garments with
which they were invested were {p.184}
looked upon as "sacred garments," and possessing distinguished virtues. "The
coat of skin" with which the Father of mankind was divinely invested after he
was made so painfully sensible of his nakedness, was, as all intelligent
theologians admit, a typical emblem of the glorious righteousness of Christ "the
garment of salvation," which is "unto all and upon all them that believe." The
garments put upon the initiated after their disrobing of their former clothes,
were evidently intended as a counterfeit of the same. "The garments of those
initiated in the Eleusinian Mysteries," says Potter, "were accounted sacred, and
of no less efficacy to avert evils than charms and incantations. They were never
cast off till completely worn out."49
And of course, if possible, in these "sacred garments" they were buried; for
Herodotus, speaking of Egypt, whence these mysteries were derived, tells us that
"religion" prescribed the garments of the dead.50
The efficacy of "sacred garments" as a means of salvation and delivering from
evil in the unseen and eternal world, occupies a foremost place in many
religions. Thus the Parsees, the fundamental elements of whose system came from
the Chaldean Zoroaster, believe that "the sadra or sacred vest" tends
essentially to "preserve the departed soul from the calamities accruing from
Ahriman," or the Devil; and they represent those who neglect the use of this
"sacred vest" as suffering in their souls, and "uttering the most dreadful and
appalling cries," on account of the torments inflicted on them "by all kinds of
reptiles and noxious animals, who assail them with their teeth and stings, and
give them not a moment's respite."51
What could have ever led mankind to attribute such virtue to a "sacred vest"? If
it be admitted that it is just a perversion of the "sacred garment" put on our
first parents, all is clear. This, too, accounts for the superstitious feeling
in the Papacy, otherwise so unaccountable, that led so many in the dark ages to
fortify themselves against the fears of the judgment to come, by seeking to be
buried in a monk's dress. "To be buried in a friar's cast-off habit, accompanied
by letters enrolling the deceased in a monastic order, was accounted a sure
deliverance from eternal condemnation! In Piers the Ploughman's Creed, a
friar is described as wheedling a poor man out of his money by assuring him
that, if he will only contribute to his monastery,
'St. Francis himself shall fold thee in his cope,
And present thee to the Trinity, and pray for thy sins.'"52
In virtue of the same superstitious
belief, King John of England was buried in a monk's cowl;53
and many a royal and noble person age besides, "before life and immortality"
were anew "brought to light" at the Reformation, could think of no better way to
cover their naked and polluted souls in prospect of death, than by wrapping
{p.185} themselves in the garment of some monk or
friar as unholy as themselves. Now, all these refuges of lies, in Popery as well
as Paganism, taken in connection with the clothing of the saints of the one
system, and of the gods of the other, when traced to their source, show that
since sin entered the world, man has ever felt the need of a better
righteousness than his own to cover him, and that the time was when all the
tribes of the earth knew that the only righteousness that could avail for such a
purpose was "the righteousness of God," and that of "God manifest in the flesh."
Intimately connected with the "clothing of the images of the saints" is also the
"crowning" of them. For the last
two centuries, in
the Popish communion, the festivals for crowning the "sacred images" have been
more and more celebrated. In Florence, a few years ago, the image of the Madonna
with the child in her arms was "crowned" with unusual pomp and solemnity.54
Now, this too arose out of the facts commemorated in the history of Bacchus or
Osiris. As Nimrod was the first king after the Flood, so Bacchus was celebrated
as the first who wore a crown.55
When, how ever, he fell into the hands of his enemies, as he was stripped of all
his glory and power, he was stripped also of his crown. The "falling of the
crown from the head of Osiris" was specially commemorated in Egypt. That crown
at different times was represented in different ways, but in the most famous
myth of Osiris it was represented as a "Melilot garland."56
Melilot is a species of trefoil; and trefoil in the Pagan system was one of the
emblems of the Trinity. Among the Tractarians at this day, trefoil is used in
the same symbolical sense as it has long been in the Papacy, from which Puseyism
has borrowed it. Thus, in a blasphemous Popish representation of what is called
God the Father (of the fourteenth century), we find him represented as wearing a
crown with three points, each of which is surmounted with a leaf of white clover
(Fig. 3957).
But long before Tractarianism or Romanism was known, trefoil was a sacred
symbol. The clover leaf was evidently a symbol of high import among the ancient
Persians; for thus we find Herodotus referring to it, in describing the rites of
the Persian Magi—"If any (Persian) intends
to offer to a god, he leads the animal to a consecrated spot. Then, dividing the
victim into parts, he boils the flesh, and lays it upon the most tender herbs,
especially TREFOIL. This done, a magus {p.186}
without a magus no sacrifice can be performed sings a sacred hymn."58
In Greece, the clover, or trefoil, in some form or other, had also occupied an
important place; for the rod of Mercury, the conductor of souls, to which such
potency was ascribed, was called "Kabdos Tripetelos," or "the three-leaved rod."59
Among the British Druids the white clover leaf was held in high esteem as an
emblem of their Triune God,60
and was borrowed from the same Babylonian source as the rest of their religion.
The Melilot, or trefoil garland, then, with which the head of Osiris was bound,
was the crown of the Trinity the crown set on his head as the representative of
the Eternal "The crown of all the earth," in accordance with the voice divine at
his birth, "The Lord of all the earth is born." Now, as that "Melilot garland,"
that crown of universal dominion, fell "from his head" before his death, so,
when he rose to new life, the crown must be again set upon his head, and his
universal dominion solemnly avouched. Hence, therefore, came the solemn crowning
of the statues of the great god, and also the laying of the "chaplet" on his
altar, as a trophy of his recovered "dominion." But if the great god was
crowned, it was needful also that the great goddess should receive a similar
honour. Therefore it was fabled that when Bacchus carried his wife Ariadne to
heaven, in token of the high dignity bestowed upon her, he set a crown upon her
head;61
and the remembrance of this crowning of the wife of the Babylonian god is
perpetuated to this hour by the well-known figure in the sphere called Ariadnæa
corona,62
or "Ariadne's crown." This is, beyond question, the real source of the Popish
rite of crowning the image of the Virgin.
From the fact that the Melilot garland occupied so conspicuous a place in the
myth of Osiris, and that the "chaplet" was laid on his altar, and his tomb was
"crowned"63
with flowers, arose the custom, so prevalent in heathenism, of adorning the
altars of the gods with "chaplets" of all sorts, and with a gay profusion of
flowers.64
Side by side with this reason for decorating the altars with flowers, there was
also another. When in
"That fair field
Of Enna, Proserpine gathering flowers,
Herself, a fairer flower, by gloomy Dis,
Was gathered;"
and all the flowers she had stored up in her lap were lost, the loss thereby sustained by the world not only drew forth her own tears, but was lamented in the Mysteries as a loss of no ordinary kind, a loss which not only stripped her of her own spiritual glory, but {p.187} blasted the fertility and beauty of the earth itself.65 That loss, however, the wife of Nimrod, under the name of Astarte, or Venus, was believed to have more than repaired. Therefore, while the sacred "chaplet" of the discrowned god was placed in triumph anew on his head and on his altars, the recovered flowers which Proserpine had lost were also laid on these altars along with it, in token of gratitude to that mother of grace and goodness, for the beauty and the temporal blessings that the earth owed to her inter position and love.66 In Pagan Rome especially this was the case. The altars were profusely adorned with flowers. From that source directly the Papacy has borrowed the custom of adorning the altar with flowers; and from the Papacy, Puseyism, in Protestant England, is labouring to introduce the custom among ourselves. But, viewing it in connection with its source, surely men with the slightest spark of Christian feeling may well blush to think of such a thing. It is not only opposed to the genius of the Gospel dispensation, which requires that they who worship God, who is a Spirit, "worship Him in spirit and in truth;"67 but it is a direct symbolising with those who rejoiced in the re-establishment of Paganism in opposition to the worship of the one living and true God.
_______________
SECTION IV—THE ROSARY AND THE WORSHIP OF THE SACRED HEART
Every one knows how thoroughly Romanist
is the use of the rosary; and how the devotees of Rome mechanically tell their
prayers upon their beads. The rosary, however, is no invention of the Papacy. It
is of the highest antiquity, and almost universally found among Pagan nations.
The rosary was used as a sacred instrument among the ancient Mexicans.68
It is commonly employed among the Brahmins of Hindustan; and in the Hindoo
sacred books reference is made to it again and again. Thus, in an account of the
death of Sati, the wife of Shiva, we find the rosary introduced: "On hearing of
this event, Shiva fainted from grief; then, having recovered, he hastened to the
banks of the river of heaven, where he {p.188}
beheld lying the body of his beloved Sati, arrayed in white garments, holding a
rosary in her hand, and glowing with splendour, bright as burnished gold."69
In Thibet it has been used from time immemorial, and among all the millions in
the East that adhere to the Buddhist faith. The following, from Sir John F.
Davis, will show how it is employed in China: "From the Tartar religion of the
Lamas, the rosary of 108 beads has become a part of the ceremonial dress
attached to the nine grades of official rank. It consists of a necklace of
stones and coral, nearly as large as a pigeon's egg, descending to the waist,
and distinguished by various beads, according to the quality of the wearer.
There is a small rosary of eighteen beads, of inferior size, with which the
bonzes count their prayers and ejaculations exactly as in the Romish ritual. The
laity in China sometimes wear this at the wrist, perfumed with musk, and give it
the name of Heang-choo, or fragrant beads."70
In Asiatic Greece the rosary was commonly used, as may be seen from the image of
the Ephesian Diana.71
In Pagan Rome the same appears to have been the case. The necklaces which the
Roman ladies wore were not merely ornamental bands about the neck, but hung down
the breast,72
just as the modern rosaries do; and the name by which they were called indicates
the use to which they were applied. "Monile" the ordinary word for a necklace,
can have no other meaning than that of a "Remembrancer." Now, whatever might be
the pretence, in the first instance, for the introduction of such "Rosaries" or
"Remembrancers," the very idea of such a thing is thoroughly Pagan.73
It supposes that a certain number of prayers must be regularly gone over; it
over looks the grand demand which God makes for the heart, and leads those who
use them to believe that form and routine are everything, and that "they must be
heard for their much speaking."
In the Church of Rome a new kind of devotion has of late been largely
introduced, in which the beads play an important part, and which shows what new
and additional strides in the direction of the old Babylonian Paganism the
Papacy every day is steadily making. I refer to the "Rosary of the Sacred
Heart." It is not very long since the worship of the "Sacred Heart" was first
introduced; and now, everywhere it is the favourite worship. It was so in
ancient Babylon, as is evident from the Babylonian system as it appeared in
Egypt. There also a "Sacred Heart" was venerated. The "Heart" was one of the
sacred symbols of Osiris when he was born again, and appeared as Harpocrates, or
the infant divinity,74
borne in the arms of his mother Isis. Therefore, the fruit of the Egyptian
Persea was peculiarly sacred to him, from its resemblance to the
{p.189}"HUMAN HEART."75
Hence this infant divinity was frequently represented with a heart, or the
heart-shaped fruit of the
Persea, in one of
his hands.76
(Fig. 40.) The accompanying woodcut is from Pompeii; but the following extract
from John Bell's criticism on the antiques in the Picture Gallery of Florence,
will show that the boyish divinity had been represented elsewhere also in
ancient times in the same manner. Speaking of a statue of Cupid, he says it is
"a fair, full, fleshy, round boy, in fine and sportive action, tossing back a
heart."77
Thus the boy-god came to be regarded as the "god of the heart," in other words,
as Cupid, or the god of love. To identify this infant divinity, with his father
"the mighty hunter," he was equipped with "bow and arrows;" and in the hands of
the poets, for the amusement of the profane vulgar, this sportive boy-god was
celebrated as taking aim with his gold-tipped shafts at the hearts of mankind.
His real character, however, as the above statement shows, and as we have seen
reason already to conclude, was far higher and of a very different kind. He was
the woman's seed. Venus and her son Cupid, then, were none other than the
Madonna and the child.78
Looking at the subject in this light, the real force and meaning of the language
will appear, which Virgil puts into the mouth of Venus, when addressing the
youthful Cupid:—
"My son, my strength, whose mighty power alone
Controls the thunderer on his awful throne,
To thee thy much afflicted mother flies,
And on thy succour and thy faith relies."79
From what we have seen already as to
the power and glory of the Goddess Mother being entirely built on the divine
character attributed to her Son, the reader must see how exactly this is brought
out, when the Son is called "THE STRENGTH" of his Mother. As the boy-god, whose
symbol was the heart, was recognised as the god of childhood, this very
satisfactorily accounts for one of the peculiar customs of the Romans. Kennett
tells us, in his Antiquities, that the Roman youths, in their tender
years, used to wear a golden ornament suspended from their necks, called bulla,
which {p.190} was
hollow, and heart-shaped.80
Barker, in his work on Cilicia,
while admitting
that the Roman bulla was heart-shaped,81
further states, that "it was usual at the birth of a child to name it after some
divine personage, who was supposed to receive it under his care;" but that the
"name was not retained beyond infancy, when the bulla was given up."82
Who so likely to be the god under whose guardianship the Roman children were
put, as the god under one or other of his many names whose express symbol they
wore, and who, while he was recognised as the great and mighty war-god, was also
exhibited himself in his favourite form as a little child?
The veneration of the "sacred heart" seems also to have extended to India, for
there Vishnu, the Mediatorial god, in one of his forms, with the mark of the
wound in his foot,83
in consequence of which he died, and for which such lamentation is annually
made, is represented as wearing a heart suspended on his breast (Fig. 41).84
Is it asked, How came it that the "Heart" became the recognised
symbol of the Child of the great Mother? The answer is, "The Heart" in Chaldee
is "BEL"; and as, at first, after the check given to idolatry, almost all the
most important elements of the Chaldean system were introduced under a veil, so
under that veil they continued to be shrouded from the gaze of the uninitiated,
after the first reason the reason of fear had long ceased to operate. Now, the
worship of the "Sacred Heart" was just, under a symbol, the worship of the
"Sacred Bel," that mighty one of Babylon, who had died a martyr for idolatry;
for Harpocrates, or Horus, the infant god, was regarded as Bel, born again.85
That this was in very deed the case, the following extract from Taylor, in one
of his notes to his translation of the Orphic Hymns, will show. "While Bacchus,"
says he, was "beholding himself" with admiration "in a mirror, he was miserably
torn to pieces by the Titans, who, not content with this cruelty, first boiled
his members in water, and after wards roasted them in the fire; but while they
were tasting his {p.191}
flesh thus dressed, Jupiter, excited by the steam, and perceiving the cruelty of
the deed, hurled his thunder at the Titans, but committed his members to Apollo,
the brother of Bacchus, that they might be properly interred. And this being
performed, Dionysius [i.e., Bacchus], (whose HEART, during his laceration, was
snatched away by Minerva and preserved) by a new REGENERATION, again emerged,
and he being restored to his pristine life and integrity, afterwards filled up
the number of the gods."86
This surely shows, in a striking light, the peculiar sacredness of the heart, of
Bacchus; and that the regeneration of his heart has the very meaning I have
attached to it viz., the new birth or new incarnation of Nimrod or Bel. When
Bel, however, was born again as a child, he was, as we have seen, represented as
an incarnation of the sun. Therefore, to indicate his connection with the fiery
and burning sun, the "sacred heart" was frequently represented as a "heart of
flame."87
So the "Sacred Heart" of Rome is actually worshipped as a flaming heart, as may
be seen on the rosaries devoted to that worship. Of what use, then, is it to say
that the "Sacred Heart" which Rome worships is called by the name of "Jesus,"
when not only is the devotion given to a material image borrowed from the
worship of the Babylonian Antichrist, but when the attributes ascribed to that
"Jesus" are not the attributes of the living and loving Saviour, but the genuine
attributes of the ancient Moloch or Bel?
_____________
SECTION V—LAMPS AND WAX-CANDLES
Another peculiarity of the Papal
worship is the use of lamps and wax-candles. If the Madonna and child are set up
in a niche, they must have a lamp to burn before them; if mass is to be
celebrated, though in broad daylight, there must be wax-candles lighted on the
altar; if a grand procession is to be formed, it cannot be thorough and complete
without lighted tapers to grace the goodly show. The use of these lamps and
tapers comes from the same source as all the rest of the Papal superstition.
That which caused the "Heart," when it became an emblem of the incarnate Son, to
be represented as a heart on fire, required also that burning lamps and lighted
candles should form part of the worship of that Son; for so, according to the
established rites of Zoroaster, was the sun-god worshipped.88
When every Egyptian on the same night was required to light a lamp before his
house in the open air, this was an act of homage to the sun, that had veiled its
glory by enshrouding itself in a human form.89
When the Yezidis of Koordistan, at this day, once a-year celebrate their
festival of "burning lamps," that, too, is to the
{p.192} honour of Sheikh Shems, or the Sun.90
Now, what on these high occasions was done on a grand scale was also done on a
smaller scale, in the individual acts of worship to their god, by the lighting
of lamps and tapers before the favourite divinity. In Babylon, this practice had
been exceedingly prevalent, as we learn from the Apocryphal writer of the
Book of Baruch. "They (the Babylonians)," says he, "light up lamps to their
gods, and that in greater numbers, too, than they do for themselves, although
the gods cannot see one of them, and are senseless as the beams of their
houses."91
In Pagan Rome, the same practice was observed. Thus we find Licinius, the Pagan
Emperor, before joining battle with Constantine, his rival, calling a council of
his friends in a thick wood, and there offering sacrifices to his gods,
"lighting up wax-tapers" before them, and at the same time, in his speech,
giving his gods a hint, that if they did not give him the victory against
Constantine, his enemy and theirs, he would be under the necessity of abandoning
their worship, and lighting up no more "wax-tapers to their honour."92
In the Pagan processions, also, at Rome, the wax-candles largely figured. "At
these solemnities," says Dr. Middleton, referring to Apuleius as his authority,
"at these solemnities, the chief magistrate used frequently to assist, in robes
of ceremony, attended by the priests in surplices, with wax-candles in their
hands, carrying upon a pageant or thensa, the images of their gods, dressed out
in their best clothes; these were usually followed by the principal
youth of the place, in white linen vestments or surplices, singing hymns in
honour of the gods whose festivals they were celebrating, accompanied by crowds
of all sorts that were initiated in the same religion, all with flambeaux or
wax-candles in their hands."93
Now, so thoroughly and exclusively Pagan was this custom of lighting up lamps
and candles in daylight, that we find Christian writers, such as Lactantius, in
the fourth century, exposing the absurdity of the practice, and deriding the
Romans "for lighting up candles to God, as if He lived in the dark."94
Had such a custom at that time gained the least footing among Christians,
Lactantius could never have ridiculed it as he does, as a practice peculiar to
Paganism. But what was unknown to the Christian Church in the beginning of the
fourth century, soon thereafter began to creep in, and now forms one of the most
marked peculiarities of that community that boasts that it is the "Mother and
mistress of all Churches."
While Rome uses both lamps and wax-candles in her sacred rites, it is evident,
however, that she attributes some pre-eminent virtue to
{p.193} the latter above all other lights. Up to
the time of the Council of Trent, she thus prayed on Easter Eve, at the blessing
of the Easter candles: "Calling upon thee in thy works, this holy Eve of Easter,
we offer most humbly unto thy Majesty this sacrifice; namely, a fire not defiled
with the fat of flesh, nor polluted with unholy oil or ointment, nor attainted
with any profane fire; but we offer unto thee with obedience, proceeding from
perfect devotion, a fire of wrought WAX and wick, kindled and made to burn in
honour of thy name. This so great a MYSTERY therefore, and the marvellous
sacrament of this holy eve, must needs he extolled with due and deserved
praises."95
That there was some occult "Mystery," as is here declared, couched under the
"wax-candles," in the original system of idolatry, from which Rome derived its
ritual, may be well believed, when it is observed with what unanimity nations
the most remote have agreed to use wax-candles in their sacred rites. Among the
Tungusians, near the Lake Baikal in Siberia, "wax-tapers are placed before the
Burchans," the gods or idols of that country.96
In the Molucca Islands, wax-tapers are used in the worship of Nito, or Devil,
whom these islanders adore. "Twenty or thirty persons having assembled," says
Hurd, "they summon the Nito, by beating a small consecrated drum, whilst two or
more of the company light up wax-tapers, and pronounce several mysterious words,
which they consider as able to conjure him up."97
In the worship of Ceylon, the use of wax-candles is an indispensable requisite.
"In Ceylon," says the same author, "some devotees, who are not priests, erect
chapels for themselves, but in each of them they are obliged to have an image of
Buddha, and light up tapers or wax-candles before it, and adorn it with
flowers."98
A practice thus so general must have come from some primeval source, and must
have originally had some mystic reason at the bottom of it. The wax-candle was,
in fact, a hieroglyphic, like so many other things which we have already seen,
and was intended to exhibit the Babylonian god in one of the essential
characters of the Great Mediator. The classic reader may remember that one of
the gods of primeval antiquity was called Ouranos,99
that is, "The Enlightener." In this very character
{p.194} was Nimrod worshipped when he was deified.
As the Sun-god he
was regarded not only as the illuminator of the material world, but as the
enlightener of the souls of men, for he was recognised as the revealer of
"goodness and truth."100
It is evident, from the Old Testament, not less than the New, that the proper
and personal name of our Lord Jesus Christ is, "The Word of God," as the
Revealer of the heart and counsels of the Godhead. Now, to identify the Sun-god
with the Great Revealer of the Godhead, while under the name of Mithra, he was
exhibited in sculpture as a Lion; that Lion had a Bee represented between his
lips.101
(Fig. 42.) The bee between the lips of the Sun-god was intended to point him
out as "the Word;"
for Dabar, the expression which signifies in Chaldee a "Bee," signifies also a
"Word"; and the position of that bee in the mouth leaves no doubt as to the idea
intended to be conveyed. It was intended to impress the belief that Mithra (who,
says Plutarch, was worshipped as Mesites, "The Mediator"),102
in his character as Ouranos, "The Enlightener," was no other than that glorious
one of whom the Evangelist John says, "In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God
... In Him was life; and the life was THE LIGHT OF MEN." The Lord Jesus Christ
ever was the revealer of the Godhead, and must have been known to the patriarchs
as such; for the same Evangelist says, "No man hath seen God at any time: the
only-begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared? that
is, He hath revealed "Him." Before the Saviour came, the ancient Jews commonly
spoke of the Messiah, or the Son of God, under the name of Dabar, or the "Word."
This will appear from a consideration of what is stated in the 3rd chapter of
1st Samuel. In the first verse of that chapter it is said, "The WORD of
the Lord was precious in those days; there was no open vision," that is, in
consequence of the sin of Eli, the Lord had not, for a long time, revealed
Himself in vision to him, as He did to the prophets. When the Lord had called
{p.195} Samuel, this "vision" of the God of Israel
was restored (though not to Eli), for it is said in the last verse (v. 21), "And
the Lord APPEARED again in Shiloh; for the Lord revealed Himself to Samuel by
the WORD of the Lord." Although the Lord spake to Samuel, this language implies
more than speech, for it is said, "The Lord appeared" i.e., was seen. When the
Lord revealed Himself, or was seen by Samuel, it is said that it was "by (Dabar)
the Word of the Lord." The "Word of the Lord" to be visible, must have been the
personal "Word of God," that is, Christ.103
This had evidently been a primitive name by which He was known; and therefore it
is not wonderful that Plato should speak of the second person of his Trinity
under the name of the Logos, which is just a translation of "Dabar," or "the
Word."104
Now, the light of the wax-candle, as the light from Dabar, "the Bee," was set up
as the substitute of the light of Dabar "the Word." Thus the apostates turned
away from the "True Light," and set up a shadow in His stead. That this was
really the case is plain; for, says Crabb, speaking of Saturn, "on his altars
were placed wax-tapers lighted, because by Saturn men were reduced from the
darkness of error to the light of truth."105
In Asiatic Greece, the Babylonian god was evidently recognised as the
Light-giving "Word," for there we find the Bee occupying such a position as
makes it very clear that it was a symbol of the great Revealer. Thus we find Müller
referring to the symbols connected with the worship of the Ephesian Diana: "Her
constant symbol is the bee, which is not otherwise attributed to Diana The chief
priest himself was called Essen, or the king-bee."106
The character of the chief priest shows the character of the god he represented.
The contemplar divinity of Diana, the tower-bearing goddess, was of course the
same divinity as invariably accompanied the Babylonian goddess: and this title
of the priest shows that the Bee which appeared on her medals was just another
symbol for her child, as the "Seed of the Woman," in his assumed character, as
Dabar, "The Word" that enlightened the souls of men. That this is the precise
"Mystery" couched under the wax-candles burning on the altars of the Papacy, we
have very remarkable evidence from its own formularies; for, in the very same
place in which the "Mystery" of the wax-candle is spoken of, thus does Rome
refer to the Bee, by which the wax is produced: "Forasmuch as we do marvellously
wonder, in considering the first beginning of this substance, to wit, wax-
{p.196} tapers, then must we of necessity greatly
extol the original of Bees, for .... they gather the flowers with their feet,
yet the flowers are not injured thereby; they bring forth no young ones, but
deliver their young swarms through their mouths, like as Christ (for a wonderful
example) is proceeded from His Father's MOUTH."107
Here it is evident that Christ is referred to as the "Word of God;" and how
could any imagination ever have conceived such a parallel as is contained in
this passage, had it not been for the equivoque between "Dabar," "the Bee," and
"Dabar," "the Word." In a Popish work already quoted, the Pancarpium Marianum,
I find the Lord Jesus expressly called by the name of the Bee. Referring to
Mary, under the title of "The Paradise of Delight," the author thus speaks: "In
this Paradise that celestial Bee, that is, the incarnate Wisdom, did feed. Here
it found that dropping honeycomb, with which the whole bitterness of the
corrupted world has been turned into sweetness."108
This blasphemously represents the Lord Jesus as having derived everything
necessary to bless the world from His mother! Could this ever have come from the
Bible? No. It must have come only from the source where the writer learned to
call "the incarnate Wisdom" by the name of the Bee. Now, as the
{p.197} equivoque from which such a name applied to
the Lord Jesus springs, is founded only on the Babylonian tongue, it shows
whence his theology has come, and it proves also to demonstration that this
whole prayer about the blessing of wax-candles must have been drawn from a
Babylonian prayer-book. Surely, at every step, the reader must see more and more
the exactitude of the Divine name given to the woman on the seven mountains,
"Mystery, Babylon the Great!"
________________
SECTION VI—THE SIGN OF THE CROSS
There is yet one more symbol of the
Romish worship to be noticed, and that is the sign of the cross. In the Papal
system, as is well known, the sign of the cross and the image of the cross are
all in all. No prayer can be said, no worship engaged in, no step almost can be
taken, without the frequent use of the sign of the cross. The cross is looked
upon as the grand charm, as the great refuge in every season of danger, in every
hour of temptation as the infallible preservative from all the powers of
darkness. The cross is adored with all the homage due only to the Most High; and
for any one to call it, in the hearing of a genuine Romanist, by the Scriptural
term, "the accursed tree," is a mortal offence. To say that such a superstitious
feeling for the sign of
the cross, such
worship as Rome pays to a wooden or a metal cross, ever grew out of the saying
of Paul, "God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus
Christ" that is, in the doctrine of Christ crucified is a mere absurdity, a
shallow subterfuge and pretence. The magic virtues attributed to the so-called
sign of the cross, the worship bestowed on it, never came from such a source.
The same sign of the cross that Rome now worships was used in the Babylonian
Mysteries, was applied by Paganism to the same magic purposes, was honoured with
the same honours. That which is now called the Christian cross was originally no
Christian emblem at all, but was the mystic Tau of the Chaldeans and
Egyptians the true original form of the letter T the initial of the name
of Tammuz which, in Hebrew, radically the same as ancient Chaldee, as found on
coins, was formed as in No. 1109
of the accompanying woodcut (Fig. 43); and in Etrurian and Coptic, as in Nos. 2110
and 3111.
That {p.198} mystic
Tau was marked in baptism on the foreheads of those initiated in the Mysteries,112
and was used in every variety of way as a most sacred symbol. To identify Tammuz
with the sun it was joined sometimes to the circle of the sun, as in No. 4;
sometimes it was inserted in the circle, as in No. 5.113
Whether the Maltese cross, which the Romish bishops append to their names as a
symbol of their episcopal dignity, is the letter T, may be doubtful; but
there seems no reason to doubt that that Maltese cross is an express symbol of
the sun; for Layard found it as a sacred symbol in Nineveh in such a connection
as led him to identify it with the sun.114
The mystic Tau, as the symbol of the great divinity, was called "the sign of
life;" it was used as an amulet over the heart;115
it was marked on the official garments of the priests, as on the official
garments of the priests of Rome; it was borne by kings in their hand, as a token
of their dignity or divinely-conferred authority.116

The Vestal virgins of Pagan Rome wore
it suspended from their necklaces, as the nuns do now.117
The Egyptians did the same, and many of the barbarous nations with whom they had
intercourse, as the Egyptian monuments bear witness. In reference to the
adorning of some of these tribes, Wilkinson thus writes: "The girdle was
sometimes highly ornamented; men as well as women wore ear-
{p.199} rings; and they frequently had a small
cross suspended to a necklace, or to the collar of their dress. The adoption of
this last was not peculiar to them; it was also appended to, or figured upon,
the robes of the Rot-n-no; and traces of it may be seen in the fancy ornaments
of the Rebo, showing that it was already in use as early as the fifteenth
century
before the
Christian era."118
(Fig. 44.) There is hardly a Pagan tribe where the cross has not been found. The
cross was worshipped by the Pagan Celts long before the incarnation and death of
Christ.119
" It is a fact," says Maurice, "not less remarkable than well-attested, that the
Druids in their groves were accustomed to select the most stately and beautiful
tree as an emblem of the Deity they adored, and having cut the side branches,
they affixed two of the largest of them to the highest part of the trunk, in
such a manner that those branches extended on each side like the arms of a man,
and, together with the body, presented the appearance of a HUGE CROSS, and on
the bark, in several places, was also inscribed the letter Thau."120
It was worshipped in Mexico for ages before the Roman Catholic missionaries set
foot there, large stone crosses being erected, probably to the "god of rain."121
The cross thus widely worshipped, or regarded as a sacred emblem, was the
unequivocal symbol of Bacchus, the Babylonian Messiah, for he was represented
with a head-band covered with crosses (see Fig. 45).122
This symbol of the Babylonian god is reverenced at this day in all the wide
wastes of Tartary, where Buddhism prevails, and the way in which it is
represented among them forms a striking commentary on the language applied by
Rome to the Cross. "The cross," says Colonel Wilford, in the Asiatic
Researches, "though not an object of worship among the Baud has or
Buddhists, is a favourite emblem and device among them. It is exactly the cross
of the Manicheans, with leaves and flowers springing from it. This cross,
putting forth leaves and flowers (and fruit also, as I am told), is called the
divine tree, the tree of the gods, the tree of life and knowledge, and
productive of whatever is good and desirable,
{p.200} and is placed in the terrestrial paradise."123
(Fig. 46.)124
Compare this with the language of Rome applied to the cross, and it will be seen
how exact is the coincidence. In the Office of the Cross, it is called the "Tree
of life," and the worshippers are taught thus to address it: "Hail, O Cross,
triumphal wood, true salvation of the world, among trees there is none like thee
in leaf, flower, and bud.

.... Cross, our only hope, increase
righteousness to the godly and pardon the offences of the guilty."125 Can any
one, reading {p.201}
the gospel narrative of the crucifixion, possibly believe that that narrative of
itself could ever germinate into such extravagance of "leaf, flower, and bud,"
as thus appears in this Roman Office? But when it is considered that the
Buddhist, like the Babylonian cross, was the recognised emblem of Tammuz, who
was known as the mistletoe branch, or "All-heal," then it is easy to see how the
sacred Initial should be represented as covered with leaves, and how Rome, in
adopting it, should call it the "Medicine which preserves the healthful, heals
the sick, and does what mere human power alone could never do."126
Now, this Pagan symbol seems first to have crept into the Christian Church in
Egypt, and generally into Africa. A statement of Tertullian, about the middle of
the third century, shows how much, by that time, the Church of Carthage was
infected with the old leaven.127
Egypt especially, which was never thoroughly evangelised appears to have taken
the lead in bringing in this Pagan symbol. The first form of that which is
called the Christian Cross, found on Christian monuments there, is the
unequivocal Pagan Tau, or Egyptian "Sign of life." Let the reader peruse the
following statement of Sir G. Wilkinson: "A still more curious fact may be
mentioned respecting this hieroglyphical character [the Tau], that the early
Christians of Egypt adopted it in lieu of the cross, which was afterwards
substituted for it, prefixing it to inscriptions in the same manner as the cross
in later times. For, though Dr. Young had some scruples in believing the
statement of Sir A. Edmonstone, that it holds that position in the sepulchres of
the great Oasis, I can attest that such is the case, and that numerous
inscriptions, headed by the Tau, are preserved to the present day on early
Christian monuments."128
The drift of this statement is evidently this, that in Egypt the earliest form
of that which has since been called the cross, was no other than the "Crux
Ansata," or "Sign of life," borne by Osiris and all the Egyptian gods; that the
ansa or "handle" was afterwards dispensed with, and that it became the
simple Tau, or ordinary cross, as it appears at this day, and that the design of
its first employment on the sepulchres, therefore, could have no reference to
the crucifixion of the Nazarene, but was simply the result of the attachment to
old and long-cherished Pagan symbols, which is always strong in those who, with
the adoption of the Christian name and profession, are still, to a large extent,
Pagan in heart and feeling. This, and this only, is the origin of the worship of
the "cross."
This, no doubt, will appear all very strange and very incredible to those who
have read Church history, as most have done to a large extent, even amongst
Protestants, through Romish spectacles; and especially to those who call to mind
the famous story told of the miraculous appearance of the cross to Constantine
on the day before {p.202}
the decisive victory at the Milvian bridge, that decided the fortunes of avowed
Paganism and nominal Christianity. That story, as commonly told, if true, would
certainly give a Divine sanction to the reverence for the cross. But that story,
when sifted to the bottom, according to the common version of it, will be found
to be based on a delusion a delusion, however, into which so good a man as
Milner has allowed himself to fall. Milner's account is as follows:
"Constantine, marching from France into Italy against Maxentius, in an
expedition which was likely either to exalt or to ruin him, was oppressed with
anxiety. Some god he thought needful to protect him; the God of the Christians
he was most inclined to respect, but he wanted some satisfactory proof of His
real existence and power, and he neither understood the means of acquiring this,
nor could he be content with the atheistic indifference in which so many
generals and heroes since his time have acquiesced. He prayed, he implored with
such vehemence and importunity, and God left him not unanswered. While he was
marching with his forces in the afternoon, the trophy of the cross appeared very
luminous in the heavens, brighter than the sun, with this inscription, Conquer
by this, He and his soldiers were astonished at the sight; but he continued
pondering on the event till night. And Christ appeared to him when asleep with
the same sign of the cross, and directed him to make use of the symbol as his
military ensign."129
Such is the statement of Milner. Now, in regard to the "trophy of the cross," a
few words will suffice to show that it is utterly unfounded. I do not think it
necessary to dispute the fact of some miraculous sign having been given. There
may, or there may not, have been on this occasion a "dignus vindice nodus," a
crisis worthy of a Divine interposition. Whether, however, there was anything
out of the ordinary course, I do not inquire. But this I say, on the supposition
that Constantine in this matter acted in good faith, and that there actually was
a miraculous appearance in the heavens, that it was not the sign of the cross
that was seen, but quite a different thing, the name of Christ. That this was
the case, we have at once the testimony of Lactantius, who was the tutor of
Constantine's son Crispus the earliest author who gives any account of the
matter, and the indisputable evidence of the standards of Constantine
themselves, as handed down to us on medals struck at the time. The testimony of
Lactantius is most decisive: "Constantine was warned in a dream to make the
celestial sign of God upon his soldiers shields, and so to join battle. He did
as he was bid, and with the transverse letter X circumflecting the head of it,
he marks Christ or their shields. Equipped with this sign, his army takes the
sword."130
Now, the {p.203}
letter X was just the initial of the name of Christ, being equivalent in Greek
to CH. If, therefore, Constantine did as he was bid, when he made "the celestial
sign of God" in the form of "the letter X," it was that "letter X," as the
symbol of "Christ" and not the sign of the cross, which he saw in the heavens.
When the Labarum, or far-famed standard of Constantine itself, properly so
called, was made, we have the evidence of Ambrose, the well-known Bishop of
Milan, that that standard was formed on the very principle contained in the
statement of Lactantius viz., simply to display the Redeemer's name. He calls it
"Labarum, hoc est Christi sacratum nomine signum."131
"The Labarum, that is, the ensign consecrated by the NAME of Christ."132
There is not the slightest allusion to any cross to anything but the simple name
of Christ. While we have these testimonies of Lactantius and Ambrose, when we
come to examine the standard of Constantine, we find the accounts of both
authors fully borne out; we find that that standard, bearing on it these very
words, "Hoc signo victor eris," "In this sign thou shalt be a conqueror," said to
have been addressed from heaven to the emperor, has nothing at all in the shape
of a cross, but "the letter X." In the Roman Catacombs, on a Christian monument
to "Sinphonia and her sons," there is a distinct allusion to the story of the
vision; but that allusion also shows that the X, and not the cross, was regarded
as the "heavenly sign." The words at the head of the inscription are these:
"IN HOC VINCES133
X."
Nothing whatever but the X is here
given as the "Victorious Sign." There are some examples, no doubt, of
Constantine's standard, in which there is a crossbar, from which the flag is
suspended, that contains that "letter X;"134
and Eusebius, who wrote when superstition and apostasy were working, tries hard
to make it appear that that cross-bar was the essential element in the ensign of
Constantine. But this is obviously a mistake; that cross-bar was nothing new,
nothing peculiar to Constantine's standard. Tertullian shows135
that that cross-bar was found long before on the vexillum, the Roman Pagan
{p.204} standard, that carried a flag; and it was
used simply for the purpose of displaying that flag. If, therefore, that
cross-bar was the celestial sign," it needed no voice from heaven to direct
Constantine to make it; nor would the making or displaying of it have excited
any particular attention on the part of those who saw it. We find no evidence at
all that the famous legend, "In this overcome," has any reference to this
cross-bar; but we find evidence the most decisive that that legend does refer to
the X. Now, that that X was not intended as the sign of the cross, but as the
initial of Christ's name, is manifest from this, that the Greek P, equivalent to
our R, is inserted in the middle of it, making by their union CHR. Any one who
pleases may satisfy himself of this by examining the plates given in Mr.
Elliot's Horae Apocalypticae.136
The standard of Constantine, then, was just the name of Christ. Whether the
device came from earth or from heaven whether it was suggested by human wisdom
or Divine, supposing that Constantine was sincere in his Christian profession,
nothing more was implied in it than a literal embodiment of the sentiment of the
Psalmist, "In the name of the Lord will we display our banners." To display that
name on the standards of Imperial Rome was a thing absolutely new; and the sight
of that name, there can be little doubt, nerved the Christian soldiers in
Constantine's army with more than usual fire to fight and conquer at the Milvian
bridge.
In the above remarks I have gone on the supposition that Constantine acted in
good faith as a Christian. His good faith, however, has been questioned;137
and I am not without my suspicions that the X may have been intended to have one
meaning to the Christians and another to the Pagans. It is certain that the X
was the symbol of the god Ham in Egypt, and as such was exhibited on the breast
of his image.138
Whichever view be taken, however, of Constantine's sincerity, the supposed
Divine warrant for reverencing the sign of the cross entirely falls to the
ground. In regard to the X, there is no doubt that, by the Christians who knew
nothing of secret plots or devices, it was generally taken, as Lactantius
declares, as equivalent to the name of "Christ." In this view, therefore, it had
no very great attractions for the Pagans, who, even in worshipping Horus, had
always been accustomed to make use of the mystic Tau or cross, as the "sign of
life," or the magical charm that secured all that was good, and warded off
everything that was evil. When, therefore, multitudes of the Pagans, on the
conversion of Constantine, flocked into the Church, like the semi-Pagans of
Egypt, they brought along with them their predilection for the old symbol. The
consequence was, that in no great length of time, as apostasy proceeded, the X
which in itself was not an unnatural symbol of Christ, the true Messiah, and
which had once been regarded as such, was allowed to go entirely into disuse,
and the Tau, the sign of the cross, the indis-
{p.205} putable sign of Tammuz, the false Messiah,
was everywhere substituted in its stead. Thus, by the "sign of the cross,"
Christ has been crucified anew by those who profess to be His disciples. Now, if
these
things be matter of historic fact, who can wonder that, in the Romish Church,
"the sign of the cross" has always and everywhere been seen to be such an
instrument of rank superstition and delusion?
There is more, much more, in the rites and ceremonies of Rome that might be
brought to elucidate our subject. But the above may suffice.139
This page last updated: 13/05/2008